dictature chili résume

But what about for shooting indoors when you can’t just stick on your long lens and shoot your buddy from halfway down the street? I can’t think of any. What are your thoughts? For others, low light or video shooting may be a priority, and if this is the case, one will want to opt for a prime lens with a low f-stop. And either of those lenses will about match the bokeh of a full frame Canon 5Dx + 50mm f1.8. I used 95% of the time. Terrible branding. Check eBay for the latest prices on the Panasonic 12-35mm f2.8. Olympus cameras can use Panasonic lenses and vice versa, as well as options from third-party makers like Voigtlander and Sigma. Of course that means no EXIF data but it's not a deal breaker for me since I rarely look at EXIF data anyway. I finally caved. Okay; I see what you mean that the “high” in “high bokeh” is a relative term. The Sigma trio are certainly a good value. You ever hear your friends argue about which is better Android or iOS? Some of Chase Jarvis’ (and many others) favorite µ43 lenses are the Voigtlander f0.95 series, but personally, I’d rather have smaller lenses that retain autofocus. Primes vs Zoom Lenses and Review Comparisons from LensTip and DxOMark. It retains its sharpness despite the focal length in use. Olympus 12-40mm f2.8 PRO (Amazon) – After the release of Panasonic’s high end X Vario lenses, Olympus wanted to release a few of their own, here’s how the Olympus 12-40mm f2.8 compares to the Panasonic 12-35mm f2.8 in a review by Suggestion of Motion and another by The Wacky Duo. Here’s a recent portrait with the Olympus 45mm f1.8 (90mm equivalent): They come in all shapes in sizes eg. If you had a full frame Canon DSLR, then you’ll be looking at something like the Panasonic-Leica 25mm f1.4 for a similar field of view. A great post with relevant information and great links. One thing I like to do when evaluating a lens, is checkout the Flickr Most Interesting pool for that particular lens, it gives a good sample of images so you know what to expect with your next purchase. Your situation might be different. The EM1 II and GH5 are likely to bring the best of both worlds, but likely not until later in 2016. Though he noticed that virtually every post on the internet was a comparison with the Panasonic GH4, eg. The optics are superior and since I hate flash, and love bokeh, natural light means wide apertures. Pick the lens that’s perfect for your budget and you can’t go wrong. Olympus Premium ED 60mm 1:2.8 Macro Haven’t had a chance to spend some real time with it, as I think the Olympus 12mm f2.0 fits my needs a little better right now. No matter your needs, there are a great variety of MFT lenses on the market. The Olympus M.Zuiko ED 300mm f4.0 IS PRO is the best telephoto prime lens for Micro Four Thirds cameras, and it's priced accordingly. Panasonic 7-14mm f4.0 (Amazon) – I like this lens, but I’m going to be honest, I’m salivating for the Panasonic-Leica 8-18mm f2.8-4.0 slated for release later this year. Search the site for a review. Like, you’re in a small room and you want the person clearly in focus but not the lamp as out of focus as possible. The sigma f2.8 trio for primes is by far the best value, i defy anybody to . Copyright 2020. I found it perfect for video, Interiors Photography (click link or see examples below) as well as some of my Urban Landscapes and street shooting and even a rare wedding I shot! As of August 2020, there are currently more than 150 different lens models available in the micro 4/3 mount (64 of them with autofocus), and more are steadily being added. Lot of good options out there, again, a lot of it weighs on personal preference. Your email address will not be published. Photographer. I have of course not covered the entire catalog of lenses for MFT, but instead the ones I love, which I bought myself as an MFT user. Bragging a set of impressive features such as its glare reduction and image stabilization capabilities, this lens is perfect for shooting videos as its AF is practically silent. I can focus on the art and I don’t miss shots. The Panasonic Lumix G Leica DG Summilux 15mm f/1.7 ASPH. PCMag, PCMag.com and PC Magazine are among the federally registered trademarks of Ziff Davis, LLC and may not be used by third parties without explicit permission. Update: March 2017 – Since I’m shooting a lot more video now, I’ll have to concur with Zach Arias’ choices. You're still giving up the optical viewfinder, but more and more midrange models include integrated electronic viewfinders, and that technology has also improved by leaps and bounds. The Olympus 35-100 f2 does look attractive! the only lens I currently have is the 14-140mm f3.5-5.6. Though at $1600, the casual photographer may want to evaluate other options. He has a thing for old lenses, boneyards, and waterfowl. If you’re shooting with a newer Panasonic body, I’d tend to lean towards the Panasonic lenses because that’s the only way you can take advantage of Dual IS and DFD Focus. But even wide open, LensTip rated the Oly 75mm at 64LP/mm (lines per millimeter) where 42-45LP/mm is their decency level, rating it among their sharpest lenses for Micro Four Thirds. Another guide I like is from Zach Arias, a long time well known photographer whom has recently decided to move to motion after many requests from clients. At only $209, this lens is a surprising addition to this list with reviewers stating that it’s sharp even shooting wide open. All of these are interesting, expensive, and not terribly important to me. I have ordered the 25mm f1.4 for indoor family use, I need the faster shutter speed to catch my infant. If you value size over speed (1/2 stop in this case), this is the lens for you. Beware though using this on the E-M1 or any camera with a protruding grip... it's hard not to get your right hand in the picture as it's so wide! Olympus 60mm F2.8 Macro – Sharpness 11, Overall 19 (EM1, EP5). Crisp optics with edge-to-edge sharpness. The best example of this is on Canon, because they have a budget 50mm f1.8 lens at a mere $100. The lens is completely manual, which might make it difficult for inexperienced users to use. Micro 4/3 lenses are produced by several manufacturers, including Panasonic, Mitakon, Samyang, Sharp, Sigma, Tamron, Tokina and Olympus, with all lenses being compatible with … I’d go for 20mm Panasonic lens. The upcoming Olympus 300mm f4 PRO will be the first Olympus lens with OIS. Deeply discounted on the used market, these are also a good value. The Leica Summilux 12mm f1.4 is a high-end lens for Micro Four Thirds bodies on which it delivers the classic 24mm coverage. A 35mm full frame equivalent, it’s very special and produces aesthetics unique to it, call it Voigtlander'esque. Couple questions…do you have a preference of which speedbooster to use? Overall, the sentiment is the kinda the same with both lenses… they’re both fantastic and you it’s best paired with the same make manufacturer purely for the aesthetics. I’m debating between ordering the new one (v II) online, or getting the original version for the same price locally. Here’s Panasonic’s “Holy Trinity” of Zooms: You could also add/substitute the Panasonic 100-300mm f4-5.6 if you need that extra focal range. Despite that, the MTF charts appear to show a very similar performance for both lenses, which seem to correlate with early reviews of the Panasonic. 8. This is a very good portrait lens actually, probably one which gives the least distortion, quite important for portraits. © 1996-2020 Ziff Davis, LLC. And it's the tiniest lens too. People say the 50mm (equiv) is out of fashion but I think its an essential for close. Early Micro Four Thirds models were a lot slower than SLRs in terms of focus and performance. Or that your lens just can’t bring in enough light to get the shot without shooting at an insanely high ISO. It doesn’t zoom and isn’t practical for macro photography (.6 foot minimum focusing distance), but beyond these caveats, this lens is great for photographs and videographers who need something fast, wide, and that works automatically. The illustration above shows that when shooting a head and shoulders portrait, with more than 7m+ separation from the subject and background, the Oly 75mm produces more background blur at f1.8 vs the Leica Noticron at f1.2, we talked more about this on the 5 most common misconceptions about Micro Four Thirds. Now I don’t see that I’ll ever get a chance to try the 1.7. 4. Back in the Panasonic GF1 days (2009+) all I had was the 20mm f1.7 and a legacy Canon FD 50mm f1.4. And actually, the competitors don’t have faster counterparts. I like the 12-35mm f2.8 mostly for video with it’s versatility, but I do prefer primes in that focal range for more light, shallower DoF, etc. And the new 25mm pro lens, but I’m satisfied with what I have there. We’ve touched on it a little earlier, and we’ll likely review some of the best options on this site soon (subscribe/follow/like for updates). Panasonic does tend to outscore Olympus on lens sharpness according to LensTip on similar lenses. A last piece of advice... don't completely rule out buying second-hand lenses. Remember that this lens offers an equivalent of FoV of 150mm f1.8 (f3.6 DoF), Canon and Nikon have $1000+ counterparts at 135mm f2. Will IBIS work normally? My lenses line-up are the 2 kit lenses: 12-35 and 35-100, and I invested in the 7-14mm and the 25mm Leica one. I have not used it as much since I bought the 14mm. Those three? Distortion, edge softness, and dim corners at 12mm. Hi Jay But tones of the images are a little more good with Canon it seems. For those willing to shoot prime, this Rokinon 35mm f1.5 offers stunning optics and lightning speed with some minor tradeoffs. Olympus 12mm f2.0 – Sharpness 10, Overall 21 (EP5, EM5). It’s capable in low light and tack sharp. Many thanks for that, I think this will really help me, I will try more at the weekend and let you know how I get on, If you think there is anything else that might help me I would be interested to know, thanks again Jay I can’t even get a head and shoulders shot from most directions (and it’s not like I’m in a bathroom or closet), and when I can, there’s no room for bokeh. Glad it helped! It's quite cool for urban shots in general. Got some good results with Fotga tilt shift and a Nikon 50mm shooting at 1.8. I wrote about this manual focusing lens immediately after I bought it and since then, it has barely left my E-M5 Mark II and Pen-F, I have now spent thousands of hours shooting with it and it's made all other lenses nearly redundant. It is built well, feels solid, has nice auto focus performance, is 100% silent, is sharp and even the manual focus is smooth, silky and easy to use. But people on Craigslist don’t really know that thus you could still find deals on what people find to be 20+ year old equipment. While it may not offer the best optical quality, most found it very solid. Let’s start with my personal “Holy Trinity” of lenses as of 7/2015: 3 lenses that you can get for under $1000 today (detailed reviews below). In in addition to the 14mm 2.5, I’d think about adding the 25mm f1.4 and the 45mm f1.8 or 42.5mm f1.7. In short, they test lens at a practical level. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. I do like the Olympus 45mm as a good value lens, though with the GX85 I’d opt for the Panasonic 42.5mm for the Dual IS compatibility. Though I hear at really long focal lengths, OIS might be better though I can’t confirm. A power and irresistible combo. And yes, no other Olympus lenses with OIS have been announced, perhaps in the future though as they revealed a Dual IS like patent similar to the Panasonic GX8. This is because a full frame sensor is about four times larger in total surface area, and measured diagonally from corner-to-corner of the sensor it’s twice as long as a Micro Four Thirds sensor resulting in a 2x crop factor. It’s certainly a cheap addition to those looking to try telephoto photography or videography. For Micro Four Thirds lenses, that would mean: Double the focal length, double the aperture for DoF, but it’s important to note that the exposure is always the same (ie. I use the Canon FD 50mm F1.4 SSC, samples above (shots of Brenda). It’s sharp, stabilized, focuses the sharpest and fastest of all my lenses. Can you recommend a lens to try? A couple of my favorite portraits with the 35-100 f2.8: Olympus 7-14mm f2.8 PRO (Amazon) – Quite well known in the Micro Four Thirds community, Robin Wong provides his thoughts (and beautiful photos!) Here’s a couple examples that illustrate that from a photographer we’ve featured before, Sergei Yurin (shared with permission via Stunning Wedding Photography with Micro Four Thirds): Not quite the best examples with respect to the background blur chart, as both pictures are probably stopped down (at least the ladder is), nonetheless there’s a lot of beautiful samples to checkout from the Flickr Most Interesting Pool for the Olympus 75mm f1.8. I’ve bought and sold other lenses, but for the most part this is my “Holy Trinity” (for now). Just wanted to get your thoughts on what you think is the best food photography lens or the closest equivalent to a 50mm for the canon dslr? Entrepreneur. Here’s a shot I took where I flipped the camera to a vertical orientation on a tripod and took 5 photos and merged them in post: Though sharpness in the center is quite comparable, the, The slightly tighter 50mm means you can get away with tighter portraits, and I even like to break that focal length rule for headshots with this lens and the. This is a great lens for street photography. Thanks Jay. I am very fickle with the lens I buy.keep changing.I love my GM1 which I will always keep.take care Jay.best Paul. It’s in a sweet spot for focal length and gives me a taste of the Noctilux I always wanted. Skin tone will get a glowing yellow touch with Nikon. Since summer 2015, the full frame Sony A7RII is the camera of choice for all my work and have never looked back!). The Oly 45mm is smaller, but not quite as sharp. It’s not a perfect lens, but it does its job very well. Beware though using this on the E-M1 or any camera with a protruding grip... it's hard not to get your right hand in the picture as it's so wide! And the truth is, there are plenty of options. It gives you plenty of separation with FoV, it’s a fantastic all around lens and it’s the smallest lens on the system (though not by much). If I had started with zooms, I might see photography differently. because later Olympus bodies feature In Body Image Stabilization (IBIS), which is much more preferred. The Panasonic 42.5/1.7 is sharper than the Olly 12mm. Nice review and very informative. If you make the comparison on one of Canon’s many APS-C cameras, the difference would be much more drastic. If you are adapting, then it would be a 100mm equivalent… which is a fairly tight focal length. Read my full review of the Olympus 45mm f1.8 here. Another manual focusing lens, so not for everyone. Here’s a few shots of mine with the Panasonic 20mm f1.7 at half body length (wayyy back in 2009): And there are other situations where you’d want to shoot a little wider, for instance with light modifiers such as the RoundFlash, you’ll want to be a little closer to get more defined catch lighting. Find more Lumix G 12-60mm f3.5-5.6 information and reviews here. Also worth noting, Olympus has inexpensive body cap lenses, the Olympus 15mm and 9mm f8. Even though I loved it, I ended up selling the 20mm f1.7 when I bought the 25mm f1.4 just for that reason. Some shoot wide open, some don’t. The imagery shot using this lens is exceptionally sharp without any chromatic aberration, and users will be pleasantly surprised by this Panasonic lens. I see the world in prime focal lengths. The 7-14mm Panny is less “funny”. The list goes on. I can look at a scene and say, “That’s a great 28mm shot” or 50mm shot, etc. Circular Polarizer (CPL) filters are great at controlling the exposure for landscapes, Neutral Density (ND) filters are great for blocking light, allowing longer exposures during the day to get that silky smooth water look from a waterfall, river, etc. There are other things to consider such as distortion and chromatic aberration, but those are easily corrected with post processing. If you’re shooting video, legacy lenses are great, especially when paired with a Speedbooster. I find I use it more that I expected and it’s a real joy to use creatively– well worth the price. 4. Last I’ll leave you with this video from Zach Arias, talking about the crop sensor debate (the Panasonic GH4 is shooting the video), and how it’s rather pointless to argue about sensors when sensors don’t capture emotion, think about composition, lighting, etc… the photographer does: Invest in good lenses. Not to mention the hundreds (if not thousands) of legacy lenses you could adapt. I’d recommend watching the Olympus 40-150mm f2.8 vs Panasonic 35-100mm f2.8 shootout from TheCameraStoreTV, it’s both informative and entertaining. For primes I bought the 12mm f/1.4 and love it. Yes, I love the Panasonic-Leica 25mm f1.4! It’s much like the 7-14mm zoom. At $1600, this Leica branded lens is the most expensive lens on the Micro Four Thirds system and rightfully so. What we don't: Plastic build and average optics. Panasonic 20mm F1.7 – Sharpness 12, Overall 22 (EM1, EP5). Let’s first state that “best” is very subjective. I also state that I prefer primes over zooms. This lens goes by Samyang or Rokinon depending on the market but essentially the same lens. The Olympus M.Zuiko ED 25mm f1.2 PRO is an exceptionally sharp, bright, standard-angle lens for Micro Four Thirds cameras. August 8, 2015 at 1:27 am, August 8, 2015 at 1:35 am, November 11, 2015 at 12:30 am, November 11, 2015 at 12:34 am. More info on the 35-100mm f2.8 from other pros: A Micro Four Thirds blogger called the Panasonic 35-100mm f2.8 “expensive, but fantastic” comparing the lens shot for shot with exceptional primes on µ43. It’s fantastic and a jewel so nice I’m afraid to use it on the water sailing with my pancake option. I have 2 Lumix camera G5 and G7(0). Find more Sigma 30mm f2.8 EX information and reviews here. Thanks again for the complete review and long life to m43 !!! Required fields are marked *. I’d recommend the Panasonic 20mm f1.7 over the Panasonic-Leica 25mm f1.4 if: I’d opt for the Panasonic-Leica 25mm f1.4 over the Panasonic 20mm f1.7 if: The Panasonic 20mm f1.7 is currently available at Amazon for $267 new. 2017 Update: I've left all my MFT gear behind a dumpster in favour of the full frame A7RII and... have never looked back. Are there any cons why would make sense to buy twice as much expensive Olympus? And if you do land in focus, with such a shallow depth of field you won’t get more than a few individual eyelashes in focus. And while a mere 2mm might seem like a small difference, the wider you get the more dramatic the effect. And now µ43 has grown to a mature system featuring over 50+ lenses with very little gaps in the lineup. So maybe better suited for a Pen, EM5 or EM5 Mark II. So let me make it a little easier for you micro four third users with this objective review of MFT lenses which I've used extensively for my own work. Samyang (Rokinon) 7.5mm f/3.5 UMC Fish-eye MFT. Lastly, Don’t Forget that Legacy Lenses are Perfect for Portraiture. It’s not my preferred focal length. Again, that's a weather sealed lens of excellent construction so perfect for the London life. but I’m deterred by the fact that the lens does not have image stabilization. This list is proof positive that shooting MFT doesn’t mean one has limited options for glass. Paul. Telephoto lens options abound for Micro Four Thirds, from this inexpensive Olympus 40-150mm f/4-5.6 down to the very pricey "Pro" version below at the same focal lengths. Comparing the aforementioned lenses, $1 for $1, the Noticron is the best bet. Windows or Mac? It's true that gear doesn't replace the ability to see and I prefer to focus on taking photos rather than spend late nights locked in my bedroom reading dirty magazines full of sexy lenses. Update: January 24th, 2015 – I want to add the LensTip results for the top two lenses: Basically, what you’re seeing here is almost a dead even chart. If it fills that nitch I’ll keep it. Olympus 12-40 Pro 2.8. I picked mine up on Craigslist for about $50, but that’s when I first bought the GF1… since the rise of mirrorless cameras, a resurgence in legacy lenses have brought prices up a bit. I’ve seen the price fluctuate on this one, currently $597 on Amazon, I’ve seen it at $500, and they do have a few pre-owned copies for a little over $400. But noted that he prefers shooting with his primes, the Olympus 45 and 75mm f1.8. Give it a try and let me know how it goes! There may still be a place for this combo. The variety of Micro Four Thirds lenses that are available in the market is proof of their versatility and the magic that these lenses with a moderately smaller sensor can achieve. Pick the lens that’s perfect for your budget and you can’t go wrong. . Utilize the Speedbooster adapters and gain a full stop of light. Review, Gear Envy: Inside the Bag of PCMag's Camera Expert, Nikon Bolsters Z System With 50mm F1.2 and 14-24mm F2.8 Lenses, Sigma Adds 85mm F1.4 DG DN Art Lens for Mirrorless Camera Systems, The Best SLR and Mirrorless Cameras for Beginners, The Best DSLR and Mirrorless Cameras for 2020. Instead, this is about my extensive experience using these lenses shooting urban street photography, London landscapes and other genres including my fresh cinemagraphs! We’ve already mentioned above that the Panasonic 20mm f1.7 is one of the best overall lenses you could buy, and right alongside that I’d add the Panasonic 14mm f2.5. I would not buy them and stick with zooms otherwise. This review will not explore individual pixels or graphs, because we all have better things to do... like being out shooting! I am now very much in doubt whether to trade in the whole bunch or partially or or or. With longer focal lengths, you’ll have to adjust accordingly. I almost opted for the Sigma 60mm f2.8, but with the Olympus 45mm f1.8 is such a good value it’s hard to pass up. That is a GREAT little lens. A set of zooms only rivaled by the Olympus PRO Series; 7-14, 12-40 and 40-150mm f2.8 PRO. Same goes for the Panasonic GX7, the lone Panasonic camera with 2-axis IBIS, you cannot use both IBIS and a Panasonic OIS lens. Find more Lumix G 45-200mm f4-5.6 information and reviews here. It’s a superzoom covering a wide focal range that has Power OIS and a fast silent AF, both a must for video. To a lot of photographers, the Olympus 75mm f1.8 is the perfect compromise. When he’s not out with his camera, Jim enjoys watching bad and good television, playing video games (poorly), and reading. I was about to buy the P/L 15mm f/1.7 and decided to go for the speed of the 1.4 aperture lens. I’ve even thinking about selling the 12-35 for the Leica 12-60, using that as my versatile lens in good light, and in low light switch to my fast primes. Yes, it’s either one or the other… and IBIS is preferred. A recent addition to my camera bag, I only held out for so long because it shares a similar focal length to the already impressive 20mm f1.7. Perhaps another low light prime? It's the portrait lens with a slightly unusual/awkward focal length (150mm FF equivalent) but it really shoots and focuses well. The lenses aperture (F/3.5) is not as wide as it could be. Take notes from Canon’s L (“Luxury”) lenses. What you have to decide, is when to upgrade. As such is you are willing to shoot your videos in prime, this manual lens provides impressive lighting speeds and spectacular optics. I plan to give myself more time with it and then transition into nighttime video use. It’s useful but I use the 14mm more often. In comparison to its competitors, the minimum focal length of 0.25m is insufficient. AWESOME ! There’s also the manual focus Voigtlander 42.5mm F0.95 at $1000. And while I love the Leica Nocticron and shoot a lot of portraiture, the $1600 price tag is going to keep a lot of people away. If you can find it pre-owned under $400 in excellent condition I would 100% jump on that! Panasonic-Leica 25mm f1.4 would be equivalent to 50mm f1.4 on full frame, f2.8 equivalence in Depth of Field (DoF). [/box], 1. This self-portrait is shot at 28mm (56mm equivalent): Here’s another at 70mm with the Panasonic 35-100mm f2.8: And as I mentioned, it’s often subject dependent and I prefer a slightly wider angle for my face at this distance… shoot any longer and my head looks like a dang balloon. 10 Best MFT Lenses: Which Micro 4 3 Is Right for You? Find more Lumix GX Vario Lens 12-35mm f2.8 information and reviews here. Boasting autofocus and aperture control, this affordable lens offers users great value. Nothing else will ever compare. Great Review! While they tend to be cheaper on a whole than lenses for larger DSLRs, their quality also tends to be better for the price; they tend to have better value. Update: March 2017 – I did it. And for Micro Four Thirds owners – that tends to be all of us! Here are the top 10 best MFT lenses available in 2019: With solid range, unreal sharpness, no chromatic aberration, and decent speed, this is a great lens. .thanks again Jay. I like the 25mm f/1.4 but hate the hood. So maybe better suited for a Pen, EM5 or EM5 Mark II. Jim Fisher is our lead analyst for cameras, drones, and digital imaging. Find more Rokinon 35mm f1.5 information and reviews here. However, having a lot of experience with manual focus lenses, I feel like you miss too many shots focusing. Today, we’ll be using metrics from the widely renowned DxOMark, most notably the PMpix sharpness score. Since then, there have been a steady stream of new lenses released for the format. For those who don’t mind shooting slightly wider, the 25mm f1.7 is hard to beat. Panasonic unveiled the micro 4/3 format in September, 2008. But all in all, a great lens and one of the cheapest. With the version II redesign coming later this month, I’d hit eBay for deals on version 1 if you don’t mind the old look. There’s a lot of different things to consider when buying a lens, but from a purely technical standpoint, DxOMark is an excellent resource and benchmark. The widest: Laowa 7.5mm f2. The other would be a shorter prime, my personal faves would be the 14mm f2.5, 20mm f1.7, or 25mm f1.4. Disclaimer: Heavy Inc. is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program and other affiliate advertising programs and may receive a commission if you purchase a product via a link on this page. Achieving a fete that a lot of MFT lenses have been incapable of, the wide-angle zoom Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm f/2.8 lens provides users with a nearly panoramic view. While some like it, I am a little bit lost during composition, Olympus 45 1.8. The Panasonic Lumix G X Vario 35-100mm F2.8 ASPH. Note: You cannot use both Panasonic OIS lenses with Olympus IBIS, it’s either one or the other. It’s perfect! It's something of course a little scary but I bought my Voigtlander and my Pana Leica 45mm second hand for top Ebay sellers (check feedback carefully) and they were like new, only... a lot cheaper. The Olympus M.Zuiko ED 12-100mm F4.0 IS PRO delivers top-notch optical performance at all but its widest angle, making it one of the best long zoom lenses we've tested. I attached a recent shot with the 45mm shot at f2.2, and here’s one on Instagram with the Olympus 75mm f1.8 https://instagram.com/p/9CCAXXsvI-/?taken-by=m43cameras. For days when I just don't want to carry my sweet sweet (yet heavy) Voigtlander or bother with manual focus, the 17mm f1.8 is a go to lens for street photography or just everyday snaps. I used the RoundFlash, which uses a single flash. The big thing it's got going for it is a very decent image quality for a ridiculously cheap price compared to other fisheye lenses. For photo shooters, this Cine lens lacks both aperture control from the camera, and any kind of autofocusing features.

Daniel Bravo Lucas Bravo, Lac De Bourg Saint Bernard, Ford Nugget France, élection Municipale Wissembourg 2020, Marinade Porc Soja, Metro Limonest Horaire, Mercedes G Class Prix Tunisie, Promo Hôtel Baie De Somme,